Irish Socialist, No. 95
Date:April 1970
Organisation: Communist Party of Ireland
Publication: Irish Socialist
Issue:Number 95
Contributors: Info
J. Flood, George Jeffares, J. Lyons, John McDonnell, John Montgomery, Kevin Murray, Michael O'Riordan, A. Raftery, John Riddy, Betty Sinclair
Collection:Music in the Irish Left Archive
Type:Publication Issue
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document

Please note:  The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

15th December 2008

A fascinating document from the Archive here. The Irish Socialist, newspaper of the Communist Party of Ireland, from April 1970. The significance of this is underlined by an article on Page 6 by Michael O’Riordan entitled Communist Party of Ireland Reconstituted. Only a short week or so prior to the publication of this issue the Irish Workers’ Party and the Communist Party, N. Ireland had voted unanimously to merge to reconstitute the CPI. Well worth reading, and not merely for the details such as the attendance of fraternal delegations from the Soviet Union, Rumania, Hungary, Yugoslavia, France, Bulgaria and Britain.

Almost inevitably the cover has a woodcut of James Connolly accompanying the strapline… The Message of Connolly - See P. 3 & 4. And up there in the top right hand corner of the banner is “Small Farmers” advertising a piece on Page 8. Then look at the box in the lower right hand corner which states:

ANOTHER FIANNA FAIL TRIUMPH! Ireland has the Lowest Rate of Housebuilding in Europe according to the O.E.C.D. Report.

The contents is fascinating. Some good analysis from the indefatigable Betty Sinclair (better known perhaps for her NICRA involvement) on the make up of the Chichester Clark led Unionist government. Clear reference to the housing actions, including N.A.T.O. Activities in Ballymun and elsewhere. There’s a ballad on page 2 and Notebook by ‘Northsider’. I’m mighty intrigued by the article on “British Interests Move to Take Over Printing Industry”. There was some presence of the left inside printing during this period. Then we have “The Plight of The Unmarried Mother” “by one of them”. Interesting to reflect on how language has changed.

The Editorial is striking. It argues that ‘Paisley can be a blessing’, since ‘[his] election… Serves notice that Orange Fascism is one again on the march. This brand of Fascism is not the creation of Paisley. It is the creation of the Unionist Party and its imperialist masters. They created it to split the Irish people along religious lines so that they could continue to dominate us’. But… “It would be wrong to see Paisley’s victory as having no positive features. For the first time there is a wide open split in the Unionist ranks. Many who vote Unionist are opposed to Paisley fascism. The opportunity exists to build a movement which will cut across religious barriers for democracy and against fascism.

The real danger is that Paisley will become ‘respectable’ and unite with Fascist forces inside Unionism.”

The proposed solution?

“Against this alliance a united front must be built to bring democracy and an end to sectarianism in the 6 Cos”.

It’s a thought-provoking analysis, not least because it is almost an inverse of the current dispensation.

Returning to the reconstitution of the CPI I wonder was the pre-existing split on the island into two orthodox CP formations one of the reasons for the development of a larger but similar left wing party in the shape of Official Sinn Féin? Or did it operate in the opposite fashion and did the formulation of a single entity make it more difficult to expand the formations due to the problematic issue of partitionist thinking?

More from Irish Socialist

Irish Socialist in the archive


No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Neues aus den Archiven der radikalen Linken - eine Auswahl « Entdinglichung Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:33:03

    […] Communist Party of Ireland (CPI): Irish Socialist, April […]

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Starkadder Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:18:22

    The article about the “Unmarried Mother” was very revealing about the
    treatment of women in “Mother and Baby” homes. I remember the
    Irish Communist Group in Britain also complaining about the excessive
    coporal punishment meted out by the Christian Brothers-it seems the
    radical Irish left were aware of these scandals before they became
    widely known in the 1990s.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: D. J. P. O'Kane Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:37:04

    There’s (possibly) an interesting bit of hidden history there; how did a point of view previously confined to the radical weird-beards of the leftist fringe come to be taken up (in a distorted form) by the sleek yuppies of D’Olier street and points south in later decades?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Gomez Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:35:28

    Do you mean the criticism of the Catholic Church’s abuses,
    D.J.P? The first book I remember about this subject was the “Children of the Poor Clares” book in the late ’80s.

    Reply on the CLR