1916-1966
| Date: | 1966 |
|---|---|
| Organisation: | Irish Workers' Party |
| Publication: | Irish Socialist |
Contributors:
Info | Joseph Deasy, Seán Murray, Michael O'Riordan, A. Raftery, Hanna Sheehy-Skeffington, Betty Sinclair |
| Collection: | 1916 Easter Rising: Anniversaries and Commemorations |
| View: | View Document |
| Discuss: | Comments on this document |
| Subjects: | 1916 Easter Rising James Connolly James Larkin |
Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.
Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution
7th March 2016
Many thanks to Bobcat for forwarding this and other documents to the Archive.
This handsome twenty-four page document was issued by the IWP – the forerunner of the Communist Party of Ireland. It seeks to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the Rising. The list of those contributing is extensive, including A Raftery (editor of the Irish Socialist), Joseph Deasy (author of The Fiery Cross: The Story of Jim Larkin) and Anthony Coughlan. Reprints of articles from Sean Murray (IRA and later CPI), Elizabeth Gurley Flynn (CPUSA) and John S. Clarke (a colleague of Connolly’s).
Contents wise it includes an overview of Easter Week 1916 and a re-examination of the Rising, which concludes:
The working class remains as the ‘incorruptible inheritors’ of 1916. By recapturing Connolly’s vision of the unity of national and social struggles they can give leadership to all those who will suffer from the repudiation of the heritage which was asserted in arms 50 years ago.
Another article notes ‘1913-1916: Similar Battle Lines’.
Elizabeth Gurley-Flynn’s piece examines Connolly in America and suggests that ‘he felt keenly that not enough understanding and sympathy was shown by American Socialists for the cause of Ireland’s national liberation, that the Irish workers here were too readily abandoned by the Socialists as ‘reactionaries’ and that there was not sufficient effort made to bring the message of Socialism to the Irish-American workers.
Another piece argues that ‘1916 proved Britain not Invincible’. And yet another considers Connolly’s views on partition. Here he offers the opinion that:
‘Personally I entirely agree with those who think [the proposal should be resisted with armed force if necessary]… Belfast is bad enough as it is; what it would be like under [Orange] rule the wildest imagination cannot conceive.
Anthony Coughlan’s piece argues that ‘The Connolly Road should lead to Labour Republican Unity’.
The publication contains many photographs of the period and after, the personal reminiscences of those involved in the Rising and also incorporates poems and songs into the text.
More from Irish Socialist
Irish Socialist in the archive
Comments
No Comments yet.
Add a Comment
Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:
**Bold text**
Bold text
_Italic text_
Italic text
[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link
You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution
By: roddy Tue, 08 Mar 2016 14:37:50
Some who claim to follow Connolly are totally at odds with his hostility to partition.
Reply on the CLR
By: Jolly Red Giant Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:22:22
In reply to roddy.
Some who claim the legacy of Connolly don’t understand why he opposed partition.
Reply on the CLR