United Irishman, Vol. 32, No. 9
Organisation: Sinn Féin The Workers' Party
Publication: The United Irishman
Issue:Volume 32, Number 9
Meán Fómhair (September) 1979
Type:Publication Issue
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document

Please note:  The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

10th March 2008

Here is the United Irishman, from Sinn Féin the Workers’ Party, from 1979. It’s a crisp production, quite different to earlier versions - if only in the use of red and black. The unsmiling visage on the front page is a relatively youthful Sean Garland. He is used to illustrate a speech on terrorism. Interesting stuff too.

Given by him to the “Irish Democratic Youth Movement” weekend school (as a side note, Fianna hÉireann, the youth section of the IRA, were considered to have been instrumental in assisting the rise of the Provisionals, so much so that I was once told ‘…we won’t make that mistake again’), it charges that:

“It is clear that the Fianna Fáil party are living in the shadow of the gunmen. Continually they must keep looking over their shoulders at such people as Neil Blaney…” And it’s not just Fianna Fáil who raise his ire. “…John Taylor is in some ways a mirror image of the Fianna Fáil government…feeling that he was overshadowed by Dr. Paisley at the opening of the Strasbourg Assembly he now howls for the dogs of war to be unloosed by Northern paramilitary groups….’ And then an unlikely (for some) antagonist is referenced.

“On the other hand their (sic) is the response of Dr. Conor Cruise O’Brien. His quasi religious view of the problem facing Northern Ireland in no way helps it to bring about unity of the people rather it reinforces those who benefit from perpetuating existing divisions”.

Overall it’s telling how this paper deals with both parts of the island, somewhat unlike the Irish People posted some weeks back which took a decidedly Southern ‘turn’. Having said that there are some intriguing aspects to that, for example consider the article on page 4 about prison reform in the North, and its passing reference to the ‘blanket’ protests. There is also a sense that it sits between two time periods. On the one hand there are the articles about former conflicts, such as Vietnam, and then pieces on new ones like Nicaragua. Thatcher had recently gained power in the United Kingdom.

And then, as on the back page, there is a further opportunity to criticise the Provisional Sinn Féin, in the unlikely setting of an article about Irish-America. Indeed this has an expressly ‘international’ feel and was clearly intended for consumption outside of the island of Ireland. How else, to explain pieces such as the following under the heading Historic:

The visit of Pope John Paul II to Ireland later this month is being awaited eagerly not only by members of the Roman Catholic faith but by other Christian denominations. Leading Roman Catholic spokespersons have recently expressed their horror as to the manner in which this historic trip has been clouded by murderous terrorist acts.Undoubtedly the Vatican will not want to become embroiled in Irish politics but there are widespread rumours that the Roman Pontiff will feel it necessary to call upon the Provisional Alliance, known to many as the Roman Catholic guerrilla army, to immediately cease their terrorist campaign.

It would be easy to say this is a distinction with earlier incarnations (and a much earlier UI will be posted up over the next couple of weeks by way of contrast). The international aspect is still there, the ideology is clearly of the left, but this is a document which focuses on its political adversaries and names them all. Yet, the UI was always clear about who those it considered to such adversaries. So perhaps less change than might be imagined.

More from The United Irishman

The United Irishman in the archive


No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Starkadder Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:36:42

    On page 8, I was amazed to see Tony O’Reilly admitting
    the possibility of a United Ireland. I’d never have that guessed
    from reading any of his newspapers. Interesting to see
    he was tipped as a potential “future Taoiseach” as well.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:11:21

    Business interests 😉

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Starkadder Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:26:54

    And the review of Belinda Probert’s book as well. I suspect
    she may have influenced WP thinking toward the Northern

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:27:48

    And a fair old bit. Still, wasn’t the CC O’B piece interesting. And … accurate too.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Garibaldy Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:36:48

    Quite an interesting edition, and very different to the Irish People. Much less a pure campaigning paper, and more space for wider and more ideological issues (the WFTU piece for example). I wonder was the Probert review written by Patterson. I suspect so.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:52:20

    More than likely.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Garibaldy Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:06:31

    Oh, and on the Fianna thing. Dunno about Dublin, but more identified with the IRSP in Belfast – Steenson et al.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:09:40

    That’s true actually now I think about it. The sense that it was uncontrolled and uncontrollable left a real memory even years ago.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Garibaldy Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:53:56

    The dynamics of a movement make that a likely problem. Hence why it had to go.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Starkadder Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:56:33

    It just struck me,moving ahead a few years…
    In the 80s, the main political magazines,
    Browne’s Magill and the Phoenix, were both very critical
    of the Workers’ Party (I vaguely remember a Phoenix
    article saying RTE,the Irish Times and Independent Newspapers,
    had all been “Infiltrated” by Stickies of the Harris school).

    Do the WP veterans here have any thoughts on how the
    party was depicted by the media?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:01:47

    Very badly 😉

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Starkadder Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:04:27

    No-one liked the poor Stickies…. 😦

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: dilettante Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:48:37

    Except the media they controlled (eg. RTE) obviously.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:53:49

    Hard to say they controlled it. They certainly had undue influence in certain areas – arguably current affairs.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: The cause of labour Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:38:45

    coming across a few of my familys connections with the workers party i had found a number of documents relating to numerous policy documents before and after the 3 splits that the movement went through what would be the easist way to donate them to the CLR as i have yet to see any of them in the archive
    some tution would be welcome via e-mail

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:07:34

    If you can email me at the email worldbystormATeircomDOTnet that would be much appreciated.

    Reply on the CLR