Northern Ireland Report, No. 15
Date:15th November 1993
Publication: Northern Ireland Report
Issue:Number 15
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document
Subjects:

Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to the Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to the Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

25th January 2021

Many thanks to the person who forwarded this to the Archive.

This edition of Northern Ireland Report, numbered 15 and published in November 1993 joins others in the Archive. Under the headline ‘British and Irish Cowardice’ it argues that:

In Northern Ireland, this fall was nothing less than extraodinary with both the possibilities of peace and the horrors of war being clearly evident. As such, the North was rediscovered by the world’s media, who emphasize the most recent acts of ”savagery” and ”carnage” over the development of a serious peace initiative. Lost in these reports was the fact that peace and justice in Northern lreland can be considered only within a context the acknowledges and reinforces Britain’s border.

It suggests that the Hume/Adam initiative ‘remains a mystery as they refuse to divulge any details’. It notes the increase in loyalist attacks against nationalists and ‘a stupid and irresponsible action’ by the IRA which resulted in the Shankill Road bombing ‘killing 9 innocent people and wounding many more in premature explosion’.

And:

Finally, and most important, as people were still being buried in the North, John Major announced that the Tory government supported a six point peace plan offered by Irish Republic Prime Minister Albert Reynolds and Foreign Affairs Minister Dick Spring. This peace plan, which hints at the possibility of unity, stresses majority consent, offers to amend the South’s constitutional claim on the North and demands the cessation of all violence before negotiation tion. In short, after rejecting Hun1e/ Adams, the British and Irish goverriments offered nothing new to the tired and embittered people of the North.

It concludes:

This flat out rejection of Hume/Adams (whatever its merits, and it had to have some given the political risks involved for both Hume and Adams) by the London and Dublin governments sent Northern nationalists a clear message: peace and justice in the North is only possible within British framework. Who are the extremists in the Irish war? History will no a doubt show that they wear business suits as often as they wear masks.

Other pieces examine ‘The Siege at Tigers Bay’, The Constitutional Debate and the Opsahl Commission as well as an interview with political prisoner Pol Brennan.

More from Northern Ireland Report

Northern Ireland Report in the archive


Comments

No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Mat Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:54:21

    What was the background / political position of the editorial group? It’s very difficult to work it out? Seems like the Alliance Party but maybe a bit more leftish?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:54:45

    In reply to Mat.

    They were an eclectic bunch but maybe not that eclectic…though I know what you mean re the tone being a bit tricky to pin down.

    “Northern Ireland Report was published by an ad hoc group of individuals in the United States who, while close to Sinn Féin, were critical of it, and particularly so during the developing Peace Process. Their position would have been strongly left of centre. One aspect of their goal was to produce a publication which was different from the more conservative leaning publications issued in the US which were sympathetic to Irish republicanism.

    The magazine ran for 25 issues, finally ending publication in May 1996.”

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: John O'Connor Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:19:35

    Hi all — I was part of the group that put out this newsletter. The content was an attempt to move beyond the apolitical Noraid cheerleading in the early 1990s. We decided to do it after attending a peace conference put on by Padraig O’Malley at the Kennedy Library in Boston. DUP, OUP, and the SDLP were there, with no republicans. Politically, we were all young and naive, and I can’t see beyond the typos. It was too focused on the provos, but I think we did a number of interesting interviews (McCann, O Bradaigh, McGuinness, the UVF/UDA, Hume, Paisley and a bunch of others). We learned a lot and people from all over the political spectrum were always helpful. No Alliance leanings though…

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Mat Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:57:51

    In reply to John O’Connor.

    Thanks for the response. Interesting project for young Irish Americans at that time.

    Reply on the CLR