Communism and the Emancipation of Women
Date:1976
Organisation:Communist Party of Ireland
Author:Helena Sheehan
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document
Subjects:

Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to the Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to the Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

6th April 2020

Many thanks to the person who forwarded this to the Archive, a short document by Helena Sheehan, published in 1976 according to notes within, that examines Communism and the Emancipation of Women.

The introduction notes that:

Women today are different. Events of the 20th century have brought us prospects that would have been unimaginable to our ancestors. The October Revolution herald­ed the beginning of a new era for women, for the construction of socialism has provided, for the first time in history, the material basis for the full emancipation of women. And it is not only in the socialist countries that things have changed. The contemporary women’s liberation movement in the capitalist countries and the liberation movements in former colonies have brought about an immense ferment that has led women to ask the deepest and most searching questions about their lives. From this there can be no turning back. The problem is that there is considerable confusion about the way forward. Particularly in the developed capitalist countries, there exists great diver­gence of views concerning the source of the problem as well as its solution.

And:

The purpose of this pamphlet is to discuss what exactly constitutes a communist approach to the women’s question. This involves outlin­ing the problem and showing the relationship between the oppression of women and capitalism. It is also necessary to assess the impact that has been made by the women’s liberation movement and to analyse the ideas that have come to the fore with the emergence of this movement. In drawing the contrast between a communist and a petty bourgeois approach to the women’s question, there must be a discussion of what light has been shed on this question by Marxist theory as well as what lessons are to be learned from Marxist practice. Above all, there must be presented the story of what socialism has meant for women in the socialist countries to date as well as Ideas about what it should mean for women in socialist Ireland.

She continues:

The basic argument of the pamphlet is this: (1) the source of the oppression of women lies in the sexual division of labour inherent in class society Which confines large numbers of women to Isolation of the private work of the private home and which results in their alienation from . the realm of collective effort; and (2) the solution to the problem is socialism as it provides the material basis for the full participation of women in social production and therefore in the decision-making processes at every level of society.

In seven sections the piece addresses, Women under Capitalism, The Women’s Liberation Movement, Marxism and the Women’s Question, Women Under Socialism and Socialist Morality.

The conclusions are interesting. Sheehan argues that:

Finally there ore certain basic errors within the left that stand in our way and must therefore be combatted. The first and the most serious, ‘because it Is the most prevalent, Is the tendancy not to take the problem of women seriously enough, and not to consider work among women important enough. But the women’s question is a vitally important political question and the ground must not be surrendered to the right.

And:

Then, there are two opposite tendencies. The first Is the alternative society approach. But this must be resisted, because we cannot just make our own individual arrangements and be responsible for setting up completely viable alternatives within the capitalist framework. Instead we must make our demands of the state and expose the Inadequacies of the present state to meet our demands and clarify how a worker’s state will meet these demands.

The other is the idea that nothing can be done until we achieve state power. A variation on this Is the idea that between equal pay and state power there is nothing much to be done.

She suggests instead that:

But there is an even deeper reason. This is because neither the.new man nor the new woman will emerge out of nothing the day after the revolution. They must be created step by step, day by day, in the very midst of the struggle. Our way of building the revolu­tion must be consistent with the kind of revolution we are building.

More from Communist Party of Ireland

Communist Party of Ireland in the archive


Comments

No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Alibaba Wed, 08 Apr 2020 15:27:06

    This is a useful and passionately argued journal which covers a broad range of issues in a highly readable format. But Sheehan adheres to the unconditional pro-Moscow line that was typical of CPI in the mid 1970s. So the horrors of the Maoist regime are euphemised as ‘the excesses’ and two digs are given to the Trotskyists, of course. 

    For instance, ‘Radical feminists and Trotskyists are even more bitter in their attacks on socialist practice regarding women.’ While footnoting the references to a broad spectrum of feminists and historians/journalists, none whatsoever is provided to support the claims against the Trots. My point is not to object to a critique, it is rather to do so in such a shoddy manner that it does nothing to substantiate the misdirected argument.

    I noticed that Helena Sheehan’s interesting and thoughtful memoir ‘Navigating the Zeitgeist’ covering the same period and bringing it more up-to-date was published last year.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Wed, 08 Apr 2020 15:34:03

    In reply to Alibaba.

    Yeah, it’s a very very interesting read that memoir and certainly offers a rather different insight into documents like the above. Also agree, there’s almost a sense of placeholder about the criticism of Trotskyists ie… it is pro forma, has to be said whether accurate or not.

    Reply on the CLR