Loyalism (Part Two)
Date:1980 c.
Organisation: Sinn Féin
Series:Republican Lecture Series, Number 10
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document
Subjects:

Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to the Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to the Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

6th March 2017

Many thanks to the person who forwarded this to the Archive.

This document, one of two parts (the Archive would be very grateful if anyone has the first part and are willing to donate it to us) on the topic of the history of Loyalist. As it notes:

In Part One of this education lecture on ‘Loyalism’ we dealt with Loyalism, the British identity and Protestantism, the Plantation, the Williamite Wars, the Orange Order and the Act of Union. Part two begins with the industrialisation of Belfast and the North-East of Ireland.

In the course of 11 pages it discusses different topics, including ‘Connolly and Larkin in Belfast’, ‘The Home Rule Crisis of 1912’, ‘The Defeat of Home Rule’, ‘Opposition in Ulster to Home Rule’, ‘Working Class Opposition’, ‘Carson’, ‘The Pogroms of 1912’, ‘The Ulster Covenant’, ‘Creation of the Orange State’ and ‘Loyalism Today’. Notably the period of Stormont government between 1920 and the poroguement of that parliament is not dealt with in any detail.

Instead it goes on to ‘Loyalism Today’.

It argues that:

It would be quite wrong… to conclude from this that modern loyalism has somehow developed an independence from ultimate British control and direction. This notion is at the root of ‘blood-bath’ or ‘civil war after withdrawal’ theories put forward by British apologists and pro-imperialist ‘socialists’ like the Workers’ Party.

And:

Britain’s differences with the loyalist, though serious, are tactical ones within the framework of broad political and military cooperation.

The conclusion is interesting:

…thus the correctness of republican strategy, directed through the war of national liberation at forcing a British withdrawal which will undermine its loyalist junior partner and, by opening the door to a united Ireland, allow North-eastern Protestants for the first time to take their place as free and equal citizens of an all-Ireland republic, can be seen.

And:

Loyalism is an ideology and politics that can in no way be compromised with short of the achievement of a united Ireland

More from Sinn Féin

Sinn Féin in the archive


Comments

No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Franziska Wed, 22 Mar 2017 06:21:10

    Can youu tell us more about this? I’d want to find out more details.

    Reply on the CLR