Orangeism - Myth and Reality
Date:1995
Organisation: Connolly Association
Author:Peter Berresford Ellis
Collection:The British Left on Ireland
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document
Subjects:

Please note:  The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

19th January 2015

Many thanks to the person who forwarded this to the Archive.

This document adds to the materials the Archive has from the Connolly Association. This ten page document from 1995 reprints the text of a lecture delivered at the 7th Desmond Greave’s Summer School a the Irish labour History Museum, Beggars Bush Barracks, Dublin in that year.

The lecture gives an over-view of the history of the Orange Order from its foundation through to the present day. Berresford Ellis is quick to point out that:

when we talk about the Orange Order we are not speaking of a movement whose philosophies have been cast in stone from the moment of its creation. Its attitudes and intentions have changed over the years. Initially it was an exclusively Anglican organisation, firstly an an anti-unionist movement and only subsequently a pro-unionist force.

He also suggests that:

Today we are asked to believe that the Order has now changed into some folkloric institution, content to bang drums, wear sashes and uphold the traditional of a ‘Protestant Culture’ whatever one may mean by this. We are told by Orange Order grandees like Rev Martyn Smythe that, I quote, ‘It is not an anti-Catholic body – there is nothing provocative about it’.

And he concludes:

For this historian, there is a sadness that a people can be so utterly manipulated by a misunderstanding of history. Instead of being shown the reality of a common past, the Protestants of Ulster have been deliberately subverted into believing a mythological history. Their view of William of Orange and the Boyne Water is a dream of a world which never existed. The worst thing is that, lacking the knowledge of the realities of the common past shared with their fellow Irishmen and women, they are still disputing the realities of the present.

More from Connolly Association

Connolly Association in the archive


Comments

No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Joe Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:35:43

    “when we talk about the Orange Order we are not speaking of a movement whose philosophies have been cast in stone.”
    I think it’s important to keep that in mind. The little I know about the Orange Order was greatly added to by my reading “The Forgotten People of Ulster: Stories of Orangeism south of the Border”. This is a compilation of contemporary oral history interviews with members of the Orange Order in Donegal, Leitrim, Monaghan and Cavan. It was only published last year but might be hard to get.
    It’s complex – orangeism, the Order and all that. As are many things and manifestations.
    One story that stood out for me in the book (it would, wouldn’t it!) was the Orange lady from Donegal who is a primary school teacher. As SF became more politically successful, she found she would meet SF members, county councillors and the like at various functions. She loved to embarrass some of them just a little bit by addressing them in her fluent Donegal Irish. Some of course could answer her equally fluently – but she enjoyed more the ones who’d squirm and apologise and ask would it be ok if they just talked the queen’s English. 🙂

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: roddy Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:29:15

    Ruth Dudley Edwards wrote a fawning book about the orange order which no doubt Joe would lap up.I have only O level Irish ,have forgotten most of it and would not squirm at all if a fluent speaker addressed me.I would simply say “nil Gaelige agam” and go on as normal.Like tens of thousands of those who vote SF and have no Irish I have nothing to be embarassed about.Fair play to those who use the language but if you can’t so what?Joe was a disciple of that prick De Rossa who changed his name to Frank Ross when pandering to extreme loyalists during his excursions North so I’ll take anything he says about either the language or orangeism with a pinch of salt.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: benmadigan Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:37:12

    will read this pamphlet with interest
    I have written many, many posts about the Loyal orders, exploring the meaning of their actions – not their words. There’s a big gap you know, that won’t go away, as actions speak louder than words!!

    Anyway, although not specifically addressed to the OO I hope you will all enjoy

    FOR YOUR EYES ONLY! – Key Actions from “The British Unionist’s Handbook”

    the ultimate self-help manual and checklist for West Brits and Unionists/Loyalists. Note the limited distribution!!

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Brian Hanley Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:00:25

    In reply to Joe.

    Where did you get a copy of that book Joe?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Joe Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:03:24

    In reply to Brian Hanley.

    I know the woman who did the interviews and compiled the book, Brian. I asked her for a copy. It was funded through one of the cross-border peace funds.
    Are you looking for a copy?
    She has more interviews which weren’t published but are lodged (sic) in a library or archive somewhere.
    Again, if you are professionally interested, I should be able to get the details and send them on to you.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Joe Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:09:46

    In reply to roddy.

    Ah look, I’ve a sense of humour Roddy. It was just a story. I, of course, accept your right to be offended or annoyed by it.

    I actually agree with you about Irish – good luck to those who speak it and good luck to those who don’t.

    As for orangeism, coming from the six counties you most definitely know more about it than I do – I mean that seriously.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: roddy Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:09:18

    Fair enough Joe ,we’ll not start a ruction about it.As for orangeism,I would have some knowledge of it and not all negative.Although I live in an area that would vote overwhelmingly SF ,about 15% would be unionist and quite a few of these people would be orange order members.They would know my politics and yet in everyday life we would engage with each other like neighbours everywhere do.Also they would engage with SF elected reps on community issues without rancour.Only last year my local SF councillor lost his father and a prominent Orange lodge member phoned me to enquire if I would accompany him to the deceased’s wake.I had already been there and told him so but I “accidently” arranged to be there anyway at the time he was due to attend.I need not have bothered because when the man and his wife arrived they were given the warmest of welcomes by the councillor who went out of his way to greet them and take him round other members of his family.However there are other areas of the North like Portadown and parts of Belfast where orangeism is a very malign influence,often indistinguishable from the worst dregs of loyalist paramilitarism and ultra right unionism.Orangeism as a philosophy is not a very enlightened phenominum and the orange state was an abomination but I do not subscribe to the notion that “all orangemen are bastards”.I accept that many join the order simply for social reasons or as a family tradition.It is those who hold supremacist views (often those in leadership positions) who are the problem and who insist on coat trailing marches through areas where other people are insulted .

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Joe Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:18:08

    In reply to roddy.

    That’s the kind of stuff about good neighbours that lifts my heart, Roddy. Long may it continue.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Brian Hanley Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:58:53

    In reply to Joe.

    I’d like to have a read of it Joe. More importantly could you get your friend to deposit a copy with the National Library in Kildare Street? They are supposed to get all the material published in Ireland, but sometimes they miss out on things like this.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Joe Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:32:46

    In reply to Brian Hanley.

    If I recall they may have been a bit wary of making it too available at the time it was published. My friend is overseas now but I’ll get in touch and hopefully get another copy or two off her. The point about the NLI is imortant too.
    My own copy I gave to a friend in Cavan and apparently it is being passed from house to house and avidly read by his Protestant neighbours.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: rockroots Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:15:17

    Fascinating piece, thank you for sharing it. Just to point out, though, page 9 is missing!

    Reply on the CLR