Presidential Address by Proinsias De Rossa TD, Workers' Party Annual Delegate Conference, 1989

Date: | 1989 |
---|---|
Organisation: | The Workers' Party |
Author: | Proinsias De Rossa |
Type: | Conference Report |
View: | View Document |
Discuss: | Comments on this document |
Subjects: |
Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.
Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution
8th December 2008
So, here is a document that sums up the approach of the Workers’ Party at a pivotal point in its development. The victories of the 1989 General Election were months away, the remarkable changes in the USSR were working their own political magic and the party seemed, almost uniquely amongst parties of the further left during this period, well positioned to grow.
It’s a more discursive piece than I remember from the speech proper. The introductory quotes on the inside front pages give some hint of its scope…
“This year I want to challenge some ‘sacred cows’… Raise some questions and offer some answers.”
The De Rossa on the cover visibly younger than the politico we’ve come to know.
But inside the message is one that, even now, is still associated with him, two political parties later…
“We need public debates on modern socialism, on Articles 2 and 3 of the Irish Constitution and on who or what is blocking peace in Northern Ireland.”
Still, it’s intriguing to read the section on the European Community and see within it the seeds of later developments by Democratic Left in shifting to a much less euro-sceptic view than much of the Irish further left.
The section on the Economy is oddly shallow, and almost impossibly archaic due to the intervening boom.
A quote from Lenin - ‘What is to be done?”, naturally - and later one from Marx can’t quite disguise the reality that the party was shifting gradually away from sterner lines. But that said the identification with the USSR is strong, and in particular the changes then taking place there.
Perhaps not so strangely the critique of Irish politics and the response of the elites is one that has some resonance today. But the analysis of the North is little better than wishful thinking… ‘The Provisionals are facing the beginning of the end… Because an overall majority in the North wants talks. Talks towards a devolved Government in Northern Ireland are not an option to be turned down by the SDLP. They are the democratic right of the people of the whole island.’.
Somehow the present dispensation isn’t one that would fit into that particular schema. And the veiled hints that the Anglo-Irish Agreement was meaningless in retrospect demonstrates their ineffectuality on all-island issues. This too is demonstrated by their call on Protestants (sic) to elect ‘new leaders’.
And what of the following?
We stand for enterprise, energy and experimentation in the South. For devolution and democracy in the North. We want a society that goes out to work and that brings home the bacon. But we do think that making money is immoral when it damages people. Or when the surplus is not shared. Socialism as we see it, is not anti-market, anti-enterprise and anti-individual. Socialism will stimulate effort, enthusiasm and enterprise in all levels of our society. Work will be well rewarded and the lazy penalised - and that means dole spongers as well as tax-dodgers, short-day shirkers as well as bosses.
In its own way, very much of its time.
More from The Workers' Party
The Workers' Party in the archive
Comments
No Comments yet.
Add a Comment
Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:
**Bold text**
Bold text
_Italic text_
Italic text
[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link
You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution
By: Daniel De Foe Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:42:37
Harris has proved what he always was. An unelected mouthpiece of a senator
Reply on the CLR
By: Starkadder Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:51:03
De Rossa looks like he’s advertising Mentos 😉 .
Reply on the CLR
By: Gomez Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:24:23
A pretty interesting item, as is the Left Archive (which I’ve
been reading over the last month) over-all.
BTW, is it true that OSF tried to negotiate with the UDA at one
point in the seventies?
Reply on the CLR
By: Garibaldy Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:31:40
There were negotiations between all sorts of people and organisations during the 1970s, such as the Feakle talks, to try to find some common ground and address potential ways forward.
Reply on the CLR
By: Left Archive: Presidential Address, Proinsias De Rossa TD MEP, 1990 « The Cedar Lounge Revolution Mon, 15 Aug 2011 06:31:11
[…] previous year de Rossa had given a Presidential Address [see here] which represented a shift towards a more market friendly Workers Party. This speech was to see […]
Reply on the CLR
By: Gerryboy Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:25:26
@ No.12 Garibaldi. The Feakle talks were between Protestant churchmen (Methodist, Presbyterian and Anglican) and members of the IRA and Sinn Fein Kevin Street. These secret talks were held at the request of the churchmen and were an attempt by them to make Sinn Fein and the IRA realize the depth of revulsion felt then (1972-73?) among the Protestant and loyalist population towards the provo bombing campaign. The Feakle talks were prematurely broken up and the provo talkers suddenly dispersed when apparently the Gardai rumbled the meeting acting on information received. The churchmen who had travelled from Northern Ireland did not claim to represent the UDA or the UVF at this abortive meeting.
Reply on the CLR
By: Left Archive: Irish Socialist, May 1989. Communist Party of Ireland. « The Cedar Lounge Revolution Mon, 18 Jun 2012 01:22:43
[…] one of the most interesting features is a long report on the Workers’ Party Ard-Fheis which [see here for WP Presidential Address] the Irish Socialist argues that this ‘heralded a fundamental change in Workers’ Party policy […]
Reply on the CLR