The Sovereign Nation, February/March 2014
Organisation: 32 County Sovereignty Movement
Publication: The Sovereign Nation
Issue:February/March 2014
Type:Publication Issue
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document

Please note:  The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

1st December 2014

This is a very useful addition to the Archive, and many thanks to ‘Spailpín’ for allowing us to scan materials from his collection.

The Sovereign Nation/An náisiún ceannasach, The Republican Voice is a 12 page large format printed publication from the 32 County Sovereignty Movement from earlier this year. The 32 County Sovereignty Movement was established in 1997 by Republicans opposed to the approach of Sinn Féin in regard to the peace process. The 32 County Sovereignty Movement does not operate as a political party or contest elections, and one member, Gary Donnelly has been elected to Derry & Strabane Council as an independent. Members of the 32 CSM strenuously deny any connection with the Real IRA which was formed during the same period.

The newspaper has a broad range of articles, ranging from one on the ‘PSF/Haas Talks Amounts to Stormont Collapse’, an opinion piece from Malachy Steenson, and the cover article on ‘Bloody Sunday: Thousands march for justice’. There are short pieces on ‘British Army recruitment posters pulled down’ and ‘The 32 County Sovereignty Movement welcomes home Martin Corey and Stephen Murney’, both of them republican activists released from prison. There’s also mention of an Anti-Internment protest in Temple Bar ‘to highlight the ongoing internment of Irish Republicans’.

The editorial, under the heading ‘The Sovereign Nation’ argues that:

The essential ingredient of any revolutionary struggle is the ability to communicate its core tenets and political programme.

And it argues that:

Each distinct phase of our struggle has produced a newspaper to reflect the contemporary thinking in the historical lineage. Each phase required a voice as a mark of distinction from the established order.

And it continues:

As technology evolved into more sophisticated means of communications so too did the political and propaganda messages they conveyed. Crude censorship evolved into insidious revisionism. Calls for freedom were replaced with calls for equality within the status quo. The term peace was prostituted to sanitise the term sell out. In line with this change has also changed the focus of republican newspapers; they are now the official voice of policy. The national conversations are now the preserve of the internet but the topics for those conversations are now the preserve of republican newspapers.

And it posits that:

The political message of republican activism must be focussed through republican newspapers as a prelude to dissemination throughout electronic media. For the 32 County Sovereignty Movement The Sovereign Nation is now that hub.

Another piece of particular interest is the Chairman’s Address from the 32 County Sovereignty Movement Ard Fheis 2013.

In this he argues that:

The two great challenges that face Irish Republicanism today are relevance and our ability to deliver it. These represent challenges because they involved change and reorganisation.

One particularly intriguing quote is the following under the heading ‘Political Programme’:

There is no social utopia nor utopian method of achieving one. A political programme is not a list of aspirations but a plan of actio based upon our abilities to pursue and implement them.

Later it suggests that:

The current economic and financial crisis has taught us some very telling lessons. To squander these lessons with a rant against capitalism is to miss the lessons it is teaching us. Where was socialism when capitalism was in crisis? Is this a mirror image of where is Republicanism when Good Friday is in crisis? And just as we are perceived as being negative so too is socialism. Socialism is indelibly linked with failure. It is linked to dictatorship, censorship, social enslavement and economic deprivation. We may not like to hear these truths; we may prefer our rants against capitalism, but the absence of any meaningful expression of socialist discontent in the midst of this crisis speaks volumes.

And we can immerse ourselves in abstract debates on the history of socialism and pat ourselves on the back when we invent a new ism as a comfort blanket but we do so at the cost of even further isolation.

And he concludes this point with the following:

We cannot build a political programme predicated on having to explain failure. We cannot go into our communities offering change on the back of outdated slogans. We cannot resurrect past conflicts as a means of making our solutions look more relevant than what they actually are for today’s problems. We either take our objective and policies into modernity or we go home. No more glorious defeats. No more keeping the flame aglow. No more workers utopia. No more populist electoralism.


No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Joe Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:59:33

    I thought it was a LEFT Archive? What’s left about this drivel?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: roddy Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:16:16

    Nothing but maybe those on the left that are photographed hugging these morons could be asked that too.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Tomboktu Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:28:22

    Sorry guys. Your comments now hang in a limbo because I deleted the spam comments you were responding to.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Joe Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:23:38

    In reply to roddy.


    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Joe Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:24:26

    In reply to Tomboktu.

    I thought Limbo was abolished there a few years back.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Colm B Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:19:48

    Maybe we should have a special CLR limbo where naive posters who get caught up in fierce fire-fights (metaphorical of course) between the hardened CLRers get sent, to preserve their innocence, for enternity. We could have a CLR purgatory for those who sin but not greviously (Roddy? Mark P?) – they’re allowed back after atoning for their sins by reading old CPIML pamphlets – and finally a CLR hell reserved for the badun’s who just want to annoy us all.

    How about it WBS? Fancy playing (a very specific RC) God? Joe – vacancy for a St Peter?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Joe Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:41:48

    In reply to Colm B.

    Mark P appears to have assigned himself to limbo already. Wonder is EamonnCork there with him?

    As for me taking the St Peter job … anyone trying to get past the gates would need to be very sound on the youknowwhat/where. Very sound.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Colm B Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:09:33

    Maybe some higher being has already being doing the job…consigned them to the various suprnatural pens as it were?

    Yes, on mature reflection, I think I’ll withdraw the offer of gatekeeper, you might set the bar a wee bit too high!

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:12:30

    In reply to Colm B.

    Yeah, that’s a scary thought! 🙂

    Reply on the CLR